Monday, 8 May 2023

Essence and Relevance of Nani Palkhivala’s views on Indian Constitution

 

  

(from  “ Selected writings “ (1999)  edited by LM Singhvi , MR Pai and S.Ramakrishnan)         

Nani Palkhivala  in his article “Has the constitution Failed?” makes the point that people have to be keepers of the constitution. He quoting S.Sinha, provisional Chairman of Constituent Assembly says that republics fail when the profligate are preferred to the wise in public councils . Politics has become unworthy of even the name of rat race and democracy reached the nadir as the average politician has become devoid of intellect, knowledge, character. Before the problem worsens to crisis and disaster , the honest and the young must take part in politics. He also writes “ Equality before the law is the  very foundation of a republic. Equal opportunity is the very foundation of social justice. But equality is achieved only in the graveyard.” He wants the aristocracy of talent,  knowledge and character  must enter public life. He wants the government by the experts to avoid authoritarianism. His punchline comes at the end, “The peacock must not be replaced a the national bird by the ostrich.” (  77)

In  another article , ‘Desirable Changes in Constitutional Law’, he thinks that the governance should not be completely  left to the mercy of the professional politicians. He proposes some desirable  changes in our basic laws without changing the constitution.

 1) transparency and auditing the accounts of the political parties. This is possible by adding another section to RP Act, 1951.

  2)partially proportionate representation system in which  political parties gaining more than 5 percent of votes cast in a region may be given representation by amending the Representation of People Act . proportional representation in the Lok Sabha  is permissible under article 81 of the constitution. 

3) Minimum qualification for those wanting to become representatives of people  as law giver needs education to acquire   intellectual equipment, objectivity, independence of mind, character.

4) to reduce toppling game

Some other change required are which would need  constitutional amendment    without changing the basic structure .

1)      Taking some ministers from outside the parliament by amending article 75 that requires a minister at the centre should be , or become  with in six months ,a member of parliament. 

2)      Resignation by a minister to his seat in parliament to focus on governance as in France  

3)      Change in Article 75 to enable  each state send two representatives elected by universities and professional bodies from each State and one from union territory

Nani Palkhivala thinks that every generation has to  defend and fight for freedom  for its survival and passing on as a legacy to  the posterity.  

Regarding electoral reforms, he says what are needed are cleansing the electoral system and expresses unhappiness regarding adult franchise in the very beginning in 1950 rather than as culmination of years of experience and training. This has led to the predominance of caste or religion or clan or creed. This opinion is debatable as Indian voters sowed maturity time and again in the past and changing governments in 1977, 1980 and in 2014. They are capable of repeating the same in future also if required .

His article on ‘States Are Not Vassals Of The Union’ is very relevant these days . Here, he says the  representatives  of  the States to parliament  are ‘the real authors of injustice’ because “The centre is nothing but the states in their federal garb.”  He mentions four basic considerations incentre-state relations.

1.   The centre must be reminded that it needs to show” constitutional morality , particularly a sense of justice and fairness to states.” (92)

2.       A strong union can only be a Union of  strong states 

3.       National interest has paramountcy in case of conflict without affecting self-respect or resources of the state.

4.       The grievances of the state should be addressed by conventions rather than amendment.

5.       Centre needs to act in the spirit of constitution.

in case of industries , the centre needs to have control over industries of national interest and leaving the rest to states ‘ jurisdiction .  Nani , in reference to President’s rule  Opines that it is better to retain article 356 devising a mechanism to prevent its  misuse. He also mentions that except in case of civil disorder, president rule should not be imposed without first dissolution and general elections.

He also observes that “we have systematically devalued various constitutional institutions including the office of the governor’ and the latter’s position has been “reduced to that of  the resident agent in a native State in the days of the British raj.” (96-97) He points out that “ A governor is expected by the constitution to reserve only such  bills for the president’s assent as are patently unconstitutional or palpably against the national interest.” (98)

He also opines that the Planning Commission is  ‘’a body without any constitutional or legislative sanction.” (98)and suggests   Financial Commission  should decide grants under Article 282 .

 Now the planning commission has been dissolved on 13 August ,2014 replaced by NITI Aayog.

Nani Palkhivala observes that the Seventh FC had recommended that 40 percent of  taxes should be transferred to the States and  opines that “the States must be given a legal right  to a larger share in the tax revenues collected by  the Centre, instead of having to rely up[o the discretionary largesse of the Union under Art.282.’’ (100)

After nearly four decades, we find that according to 15th Financial Commission  

“The share of states in the central taxes for the 2021-26 period is recommended to be 41%, same as that for 2020-21.  This is less than the 42% share recommended by the 14th Finance Commission for 2015-20 period.  The adjustment of 1% is to provide for the newly formed union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh from the resources of the centre.” (https://prsindia.org/policy/report-summaries/report-15th-finance-commission-2021-26. Accessed on 9th May, 2023 )

At the end , Nani  points out says that the centre’s attitude to treat states as ‘vassals’ and maintains that the “lasting  solution lies not in the statute- book but in the conscience of men in power.” (102), that is the members of the parliament and dynamic and informed public opinion. His memorable lines  are :

“In a constitution what is left unsaid is as important as what is said.”  

"The survival of our democracy and the unity and integrity of the nation depend upon the realization that constitutional morality is no less essential than constitutional legality. Dharma (Righteousness ; sense of public duty) live sin the hears of public men ; when it dies there , no constitution , no law, no amendment can save it.” (102)  

Sunday, 7 May 2023

Alluri Sitaramaraju

 

                                         

You have  pledged  to destroy  tyranny dreadful over folks

You are the ocean of light bright     

Out of surging waves of   revolutionary fervor of India!

Yours is history  immortal  for Telugus!

 

On seeing   your  brave figure of warrior spirit

Elated  was  Telugu nation  in India!

Blasted   were  rivals’ ears  by your conch of victory

Blessed was the forest by touch of your feet!     

 

Scion of royals ! You  looted the government   alien 

Out to exploit the innocents  with its hands  demoniac

Spread  the red salutes your   movement heroic

before the feet of   Andhra prowess!

 

Followed by  Gamu  Doras as body guards

 And the army of Bhils with their bows

You took up the  Bow of Dharma

 Jumped to smash the  shackles of Mother!          

 

Let the whites  might have labeled   you a bandit leader!

What did you  rob?

The anger untenable!

Tyranny unlimited!    

 

Unable to see her lord of life

Your love gave up her life

Uniting with her

‘ Ramaraju’ turned ‘Sitaramaraju’!

 

Pride, perseverance, patriotism

Bravery matchless were yours

Sacrificing your life in the fire of freedom fight

You  ennobled Telugus’ hearts!!  

 

Police took you away with  prayers

Treated  you like the  Lord supreme

Piled  their weapons before your feet lotus

Kudos to your influence enormous!!

 

Perturbed were the military battalions for your “Mirch Mail”

Shaken the brute power at your upsurge

Shines forever  your history like gems bright

 At  the top of the Crown of Bharata Bharati!! 

         (Original : from  Udayasri , II by   Karunasri   )                                                    

 Rabindranath Tagore 

"The same stream of life that runs through my veins night and day runs through the world and dances in rhythmic measures. It is the same life that shoots in joy through the dust of the earth in numberless blades of grass and breaks into tumultuous waves of leaves and flowers." 
This very well sums up the philosophy of life that world needs today for encouraging bio-diversity and sustainable development. 

Language as Jet : An appreciation of Blood , Toil, Tears and Sweat : The Great speeches

                                          (During and after the WW II)                       

Churchill’s speeches during the war roused the Britishers to fight against Hitler’s regime. In his famous speech titled  Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat ( 13 May,1940) , Churchill recalled to head the government says

 You ask, what is our aim ? I can answer in one word: Victory -victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be ; for without victory, there is no survival. Let that be realized; no survival for the British Empire; no survival for the urge and impulse of the ages, that mankind will move forward towards its goal. (149 )              

This shows that war is between an empire fast declining and another one which is hoping to rise. This is a war between imperialists. At the same time Churchill rouses his nation to wage war against tyranny. He uses ‘wage war’ repeatedly to rouse the nation in crisis.

 You ask, what is our policy? I will say: It is to wage war by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny , never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime.” (149)

His words are stirring in his speech ‘Wars Are Not Won by Evacuations’ ( 4 June, 1940) .;

We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on  the seas and the oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches , we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender…(165)

He exhorts his countrymen to stand up to Hitler as follows :

Upon this battle depends the survival of Christian civilization. Upon it depends our own British life, and the long continuity of our institutions and our Empire… But if we fail then the whole world , including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.” (178)  

In the same speech he uses phrases such as  ‘disillusioned eye’ and we come across  ‘prodigious slaughter’ , ‘Olympian fortitude’ ( In “A Long and Hard War’, 1941)

 In his speech ‘The Few’ (1940) we find the undimmed hope :

The British nation and the British Empire finding themselves alone, stood undismayed against disaster. No one flinched or wavered; nay, some who formerly thought of peace, now think only of war. Our people are united and resolved , as they have never been before. Death and ruin have become small things compared with the shame of defeat or failure in duty. (184-185)      

The War was won by the UK against Hitler  but the Empire which was expected to last forever    began crumbling in 1947 with India gaining independence.

In post war period Churchill spoke  against socialism and ‘abject worship of State’ and says in his speech ‘Some form of Gestapo’ (1945):

“Socialism is, in its essence, an attack not only upon British enterprise, but upon the  right of the ordinary man or woman to breathe freely without having a harsh, clumsy , tyrannical hand clapped across their mouths and nostrils.’’ (273)

 In his speech ‘The Iron Curtain’, 1946 he still  spoke glowingly about Russia.

       “I have strong admiration and regard for the valiant Russian peoples and for my wartime comrade Marshall Stalin.”

“While wishing for abiding friendship, the rightful place for Russia among the leading nations of the world, he  immediately expresses his apprehension From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic , an iron curtain has descended across the  continent” (303) During the  Cold war period this antagonism continued in the backdrop of  threat of  nuclear Armageddon.    

Even way back in 1919, Churchill used the language of solid imperialist against Russian Revolution. “Of all tyrannies in history the Bolshevist tyranny is the worst, the most destructive , and the most degrading. It is sheer humbug to pretend that it is not far worse than German militarism. The miseries of Russian people under the bolshevists far surpass anything they suffered under the Tsar.” (88)

He was bitter since Russia withdrew from imperialist war causing the deaths of many s imperialist soldiers , supported  White army generals who lost at the end ,  worried over the prospects of revolution in Germany,  and describes the Russian Bolshevist  causing  anarchic destruction and calling for resisting ‘the advances of Bolshevist tyranny’ (92)

He, after the second World War, praised  in his speech ‘Never Despair’ delivered in  1955 ‘the glorious defence of their native soil by the Russian armies and people have inflicted wounds upon the Nazy  tyranny ’ (343) and said he was not against Russian people. Despite Russian  mighty role  in defeating Germany at an enormous cost in the second World war, Churchill’s opposition to the Soviet regime continued afterwards. But it was the Soviet Union which stood by India in its struggle for freedom.

     

 

 

 

 

 

                            

Saturday, 6 May 2023

Language as Spitfire : A critical appreciation of Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat : The Great speeches

                                        

                                                  Selective : part 1 ( Before the WW II )

   It is difficult to like Churchill, the politician but it is more difficult to dismiss Churchill’s  speeches  and his war time contribution to defeat fascism. Churchill harnessed English language for   victory. He played his role in the sustenance and  the  celebration of the Empire.

Churchill  (1874-1965) prepared hard to become a successful  political leader and writer. He joined conservative party in 1900 and left it in 1904 to join Liberals. He rejoined conservative party in 1925.  In his career he became MP, Minister of munitions, minister of State for War and Air and Prime minister twice  during 1940-1945 and 1951-55. He published many works , The Story of Malakand Field Force (1898), The River War and Savrola (1899), The World Crisis (1923-31), My Early Life (1930), Thoughts and Adventures ( 1932), Marlborough: His Life and Times  1933-38) , Great Contemporaries (1937), Step by Step (1939), The Second World War (1948-54), A History of The English -Speaking Peoples (1956-58). He won the Nobel prize for Literature in 1953.

In his speech  “I Have done My Best” in 1925 he writes regarding the role of national government as follows:

“Action-action, not hesitation; action, not words; action, not agitation. The nation waits its orders. “ The French Revolution could not defend the soil of France without compulsion. The American commonwealth could not maintain the integrity of its State without compulsion, but modern Britain has found millions of citizens who all of their own free will have eagerly or soberly resolved to fight and die for the principles at stake and to fight and die in the hardest , the cruellest, and the least rewarded of all the wars that men have fought.” (68)

He refers to  the deadly enemy Germany which stops  at nothing  for victory, he writes, To fail is to be enslaved , or, at the very best, to be destroyed.” (69) He paints  vividly through his rhetorical flourish the nature of enemy. Churchill ‘s remarkable skill in unearthing motivation of enemy is laudable.

.. we are confronted with a foe  who would without the slightest scruple extirpate us,  man, woman, and child , by any method open to him if he had the opportunity. We are fighting a foe who  would not hesitate one moment to obliterate every single soul in this great country this afternoon if it could be done by pressing a button.   

Here the premonition of weapon of mass destruction. In the first World War    

“As many as 74,187 Indian soldiers died during the war and a comparable number were wounded. Their stories, and their heroism, have long been omitted from popular histories of the war, or relegated to the footnotes.”   ( https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33317368)

We Indians do not take kindly to the disparaging remark on Gandhi by Churchill. In his speech made in 1931, Churchill  criticizes socialist administration and remarks   “It is alarming and nauseating to see Mr. Gandhi , a seditious Middle Temple lawyer, now posing as a fakir of a well known in the East, striding half-naked up the steps of the viceregal palace . while he is still organizing and conducting a defiant campaign of  civil disobedience , to parley on equal terms with the representative of the King-Emperor.“ (103)

 This negative description of Gandhi  dented  the image of Churchill in Indian mind and later his opposition to grant independence to India .  

Churchill was concerned about stronger German Air force and in his speech ‘The Locust Years’(1936)  which means lost criticized govt. as follows in powerful language which expresses ambiguous attitude of the government.

 “So they go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity , all-powerful to be impotent. ‘ (121)

When Czechoslovakia was sacrificed to Germany he gave a speech criticizing the appeasement policy  or five  lost years for Britain and France  in  “ A Total and Unmitigated Defeat’(1938) as follows:

 We have been reduced from a position where the word ‘war’  was considered one which could be used only by persons qualifying for a lunatic asylum. We have been reduced from a position of safety and power -power to do good, power to be generous to a beaten foe , power to make terms with Germany, power to give her proper  redress for her grievances, power to stop her arming if we chose, power to take any step in strength or mercy or justice which we thought right -reduced in five years from a position safe and unchallenged to where we stand now.  (136)

By repeating the same phrase ‘ we have been reduced’ he emphasises what has been lost and this certainly is an impassioned and  impressive speech though at the time it was considered alarmist.

While referring to the Prime minister’s desire for cordiality between Britain and Germany he supports relations between people of both the countries  but not with German government. His speech reveals a clarity of mind unclouded by  the hostility between two nations.  

 You must have  diplomatic and correct relations , but there can never be friendship between the British democracy and the Nazi power, that power which spurns Christian ethics, which cheers its onward course by a barbarous paganism, which vaunts the spirit of aggression and conquest, which derives strength  and perverted pleasure from persecution,  and uses, as we have seen , with pitiless brutality the threat of murderous force . That power cannot ever be the  trusted friend of the British democracy. (141)

Primary  source :
 Ed. Cannadine, David.  Winston S. Churchill    Blood,, Toil, Tears and  Sweat :the Great Speeches . 

       London: Penguin Books, 2007.      

Friday, 5 May 2023

Sprouting of Truth and Reconciliation : A Close Reading of Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o 's A Grain of Wheat

 

Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o wrote the novel, A Grain of Wheat in 1967 and revised it in 1987. The novel shows the conditions during the Mau Mau movement against the British Colonialism. It shows how different characters of the novel react differently in the condition then prevailed.   Mugo  embraces silence being guilt ridden, Gokonyo torturing him self with his suspicion and  alienation from his wife Mumbi , Mumbi’ s helplessness in her submission to Karanza, collaborator with the British and a rival of Kihika , the martyr of the movement,  and the attempts by Kihika’s  comrades to find out the person responsible for Kihika’s death.

 Mugo  who has come back from detention camp starts alone on the outskirts of village Githima  . His silence is taken as seriousness by others but he is afraid of others such as the mother of Githogo, the deaf and dumb man killed by the soldiers and his aunt Waitherero. While Mugo immerses himself in farming , Gikonyo who is  also  a returnee  from a  detention camp  turns into  a successful businessman.   

Another old man Warui refers to the martyrs such as Waiykai and Harry who died for the community. Wambui was an old woman who had great tales about her boldness in helping the  movement . Koina and the General R.  were on the mission to find out the betrayer of Kihika.

Gokonyo who also returned from, detention camp expresses his doubt regarding his child born in his absence to Mugo who also listens to the story of Mumbi later on. So, he is comparable to a pastor who is a privy to the confessions of the troubled people.

In the same novel we also find the sub plot of John Thompson, the librarian of research station. Thompson who  returns from Madagascar campaigns gets interested in literature and history and is on writing the work Prospero in Africa.    His wife Margery frustrated is seduced by  Dr Van Dyke who meets a sudden death. Margery is filled by guilt but her uneasy relation with her husband continues as they are about to leave Kenya on the eve of ‘Uhuru’ or independence.

Karnaza is another character shown as the lackey of the British but who tries to appear friendly with  his own community. He  is like one who wants to hunt along with hounds and running with hares.

The novelist creates pathos,  irony, wry humour and the impact of guilt on individuals. The deaf and dumb Githogo’s death  while running in his bid to rescue his mother and being seen as terrorist by the soldiers. The cruel death of Waiyaki expected to  raise horror and Gikonyo’s anguish over his wife Mumbi’s infidelity in her utter helplessness and starvation. He depicts the colonial officer Thompson’s obsession  in his work of civilizing the savage that leads to his wife Mergery’s seduction by Dyke and  her alienation  from her husband. His humour brings  a silent smile on the lips of the reader when he comes to the last line.   

  “The eating- house was called Your Friend Unto  Death, in short , Friend. The stony walls were covered with grease, a fertile ground for flies. They buzzed around the customers, jumped on top of the cups and plates and at times even made love on food brought on the table.(39).”

Ngugi also portrays the  estranged relationship among the Whites. He sees how Dr Lynd’s aggressive dog tries to attack Karanja, the silence of the black people, the fears of Dr .Lynd regarding the blacks and who narrates how her trusted  domestic servant along with two others gagged her and  killed her dog brutally. Thompson who also  worked as a district officer remembers the killing of eleven detainees at Rira when they went on hunger strike and  being in charge he was shifted to Githima.

Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o  shows corruption prevalent in colonial s well as  employees after independence. MP, police who accept money from Gikonyo, Karanja who wants to have best of both the colonial era and aftermath are representative of corruption.

 Mugo’s  physical appearance and  inner reality are  polar opposites. The people have respect for his solitary behaviour, time and suffering  in camp. Ngugi describes him as follows:

“He was tall with large dark eyes; the lines of his face were straight, clearly marked, almost carved in stone -one of those people who induce hope and trust on the evidence of their looks.”( 63) but this is completely in variance with what goes on in the mind of Mugo when he is invited to speak at uhuru celebrations. He becomes suspicious of party men for choosing him in stead of other such as Gikonyo or Warui or any other forest fighters , praises himself  cunningness in telling convincing lies but could  not refuse himself  from speaking. In the meeting other detainees spoke of love for country which kept them alive whereas Mugo spoke of his love of home but his abrupt ending makes people see him only positively.

Gikonyo was an adroit carpenter who loves his work. He also falls in love with Mumbi, the sister of kihika . Ngugi describes the happiness Gikonyo felt while making panga for Mumbi’s mother. Here Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o  writes as follows ;

   “He felt free .Everything , Thabai , the whole world was under the control of his hand. Suddenly the wave of power broke into ecstasy, an exultation. Peace settled in his heart.He felt a holy calm; he was in love with  all the earth.” (80).

Earlier a woman brings a piece of  wood to Gikonyo. Here the writer describes the carpenter’s passion in his work.

The woman stands there admiring the movement of his muscles. After a while, he lifts the piece of wood , its far end resting on the table. He shuts the left eye and peers at the wood with his half-open right eye. The he closes his right eye and repeats the performance with the other eye. This finished, he knocks at it swiftly, rhythmically. With the knuckle of the right front finger as if he is exorcizing spirits from the wood. Next, he takes the hamme; srike, listen, srike, listen. Then he sniffs the wood carefully ( that is professionally), and gives it back to the woman. He resumes the other job.(72)   

 

 One of the Kenyans called  Jackson converted  to Christianity and tried to influence others. The  converts or the revivalists were suspected by the movement people and Jackson and earlier teacher Muniu. Kihika was a rebel from his school days , questioning his teacher Muniu for false interpretation of the Bible regarding circumcision, refuses from punishment by teacher and runs away to freedom. He inspires  Mumbi and others through telling them how Gandhi defied the British rule and courted prison. Mumbi, the beautiful girl loves and chooses  Gikonyo in preference to Karanza . Whiee the trio were running to see the train, Karanza outruns them leaving free both Gikonyo and Mumbi to experience joy of union. The novelist describes it in lyrical prose. Karanza who feels outwitted turns jealous and  apprehensive about intimacy between Gikonyo and Mumbi and struggle hard to control himself.

    The novelist portrays the humanist side of Karanza despite his jealousy, breaking of oath, siding with the colonials and the  seduction of Mumbi who gives birth to his child. You find similar desertions – the desertion of Wambuku who refuses to  go into forest along with Kihika , Gikonyo’s  confession to the authorities to exchange  detention camp life for imaginary happy life with his wife Mumbi and mother Wangari which proves illusory when he come to know of Mumbi’s child from Karanza , his  impotent anger against Karanza , Mugo who lends his ear to listen to  the anguish of Gikonyo and Mumbi all the while hiding his guilt for his  part in the betrayal and death of Kihika ,his consternation when praised by drunkard  Githua who lost his leg to a colonial  bullet and who addresses him as the chief  in the bar    Gatu, who keeps his courage and humour intact in Yala camp  and Kihika emerge as undaunted  heroes and martyrs. Njeri shows contempt when she comes to know of Wambuki’s  weakness in her love towards Kihika , Gikonyo’s rage against the child of Mumbi and Karanza , and the Gikonyo’s desperate  look at  Rung’ei are portrayed rather poignantly. What we find here is a see-saw game between trust and distrust, illusion and reality,  purity of the soul and  circumstantial corruption , idealism and  cynicism.  Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o  shows  the conflicting forces in all their humanity ,the intricate conditions and good and evil in people on either side.

The writer’s description of nature is stunning. While describing the memory of day during emergency,

 The crops- young maize plants, potatoes, beans, peas-opened out and spread their leaves to the sun. Mugo used a small jembe to turn the soil over in the bare and weedy patches between the plants , his fingers earthing up the crops. As he disturbed the plant stems , the dew drops on the leaves would break and melt away. The air was fresh and clear and sharp. The fields around, all covered with green  things-long, wide leaves hiding the dark earth-appeared beautiful to look at. The sun became increasingly hotter; the moisture on leaves evaporated; leaves dropped, so that at noon the greatness had waned , slightly ashy, and the fields appeared tired. Mugo lay back under the shade of a Mwariki and experienced that excessive contentment which one feels during a noon ret from toil(121-122)           

           

While visiting Gikonyo’s home , he remembers his stay in camp , hoe he remained tight-lipped during interrogation, hunger strike by the  detainees and beating and deaths of eleven prisoners.  Mugo does not Gikonyo at home, mumbi invites him for tea and relates how Wambuku , Kihika’s woman has gone berserk after she comes to know of the death of kihika. Mumbi also comes to know about Gikonyo’s revealing of their relation including how she bore  the child of Karanza..

The novel shows how the colonial administration seeks revenge for an attack on Mahee Police post, demolishes old homes of Thabai village and erects a camp, restrains movement of people leading to starvation of women and children and even molestation of  women by soldiers who cause the death of Wambuku. Mumbi elates her story after Gikonyo was taken away, the starvation of her family of five including her parents faced, deaths of villagers in the  trench labouring and Karanja who has joined home guards and became Chief later on  approaching her , her calling him Judas, his protestations of innocence and vouchsafing of the supremacy of the Whites,  the intimacy between her mother-in-law and herself  talking of release of Gikonyo and  giving herself to Karanja in submissive gratitude.

The irony lies in  her confession to Mugo who has been a betrayer of Kihika  to be exposed during freedom celebrations. The novelist describes the dilemma  of Mugo  after listening to Mumbi’s story in a moving manner.

 She paused. The light still played in her dark voluptuous eyes. She was young. She was beautiful. A big lump blocked Mugo’s throat. Something heaved forth; he trembled; he was at the bottom of  the pool, but up there, above the pool ran the earth; life, struggle ,even amidst pain and blood and poverty, seemed beautiful; only for a moment; how dared he believe in such a vision , an illusion? (146)

Kihika’s friends General R. , Koina and others are in search of the betrayer. They suspect Karanja as  the responsible person for Kihika’s death.Kranja himself is afraid of the exit of the British colonials.

John Thompson who served the empire faithfully in all its brutality and ‘civilizing ‘ mission  realises that their days of reign  are over in Kenya, but  tells his wife Margery while returning from  party,” Africa cannot, cannot do without Europe.”(  161)

While Mugo is haunted by guilt and searching eyes of people, every one line Warui, Githua and others think of him as hero. His refusal to agree to  talk during freedom festival is seen as modesty. His confession to Mumbi  who when asked by others went to convince him to talk at the festival. He recounts the horrors of the camp life and expresses his guilty mind.

 Imagine all your life you can not sleep-so many fingers touching your flesh-eyes always watching you-in dark places-in corners-in streets -in the fields-sleeping, waking, o rest-ah! Those eyes- cannot you for a minute , leave a man alone- I mean -let a man eat, drink, work-all of you-Kihika, Gikonyo -the old woman, that general -who sent you here tonight / who ? Aah! Those eyes again -we shall see who is stronger-now- (180)

He  prevents  her from leaving and uses physical force making her see terror in his wyes and submitting herself to him and sobbing later.  

Mugo remembers Kihika’s meeting with him after Killing Robson, his words on importance of freedom , the human fears of death and ask Mugo to meet him again. the novelist portrays the psychological ambiguity of Mugo, Karanja and even Gikonyo who  separates from his wife Mumbi over her bearing the child of karanja. Gikonyo’s mother chides him for his insensitivity. Karnaja  who has joined home guards and killed many black freedom fighters feels lost after the exit of the British, feels slighted over Mumbi’s concern for the Gikonyo wounded in the race with karanja, gets reprieved by Mugo’s confession of his guilt and dies by suicide after falling under train. The same Mugo who defied the colonial whipping of a pregnant woman in the trench, feels Kihika as a nuisance in his  comfortable life , betrays him  and earns the  scorn of the whites, spends a term in the camp  and  returns home  to suffer from guilt. His open confession during Uhuru celebrations shocks people and leads to his death by Kihika’s friends.

But his courage in confession is applauded by Karanja ,  and even Gikonyo who remembers his  own confession regarding oath taken and he grasps that he is not much different from others who bent if not broken.The novel ends on a note of reconciliation between   Gikonyo in hospital and Mumbi who still retains her freedom of choice. Gikonyo thinks of a wedding gift , a stool carved from Muiri wood . “ I’ll change the woman’s figure. I shall carve a woman big -big with child.”(243)  

In the novel Mumbi emerges as a fascinating character. She is a sister of Kihika, loves Gikonyo, suffers starvation during mergency and tales care of her parents,  mother-in-law and child,  tries to save Karanja by sending him a note,  understands Mugo, and stands  free  psychologically in her life.   

In the entire novel   Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o unfolds the drama of struggle in all its complexity, ambiguity and brutality of the colonial officers, passion for freedom of people like Kihika, and general R, Koina, cowardice , betrayal, opportunism by some blacks who join the colonial system,  sufferings of  fathers, mothers  , wives and the detainees and inevitable compromises  of the women like Mumbi, Wambuku during the struggle period  and the folks’  worship of the heroes or whom they  assumed  as heroes in freedom struggle, the silence of Wambui over the fate of Mugo punished by the movement. Jomo Kenyatta’s invisible presence, and  the continuation of colonial police system even after independence. The novelist presents the complex  truth in beautiful and poignant prose delineating the situation and  characterisation of the people caught in the transition to  freedom.                       

 

            

 

 

Friday, 28 April 2023

Empathy for migrants: A Reading of Abdulrazak Gurnah' The Last Gift

 

Abdulrazak Gurnah’s The Last Gift  (2011) portrays the silence of the migrant Abbas who married an orphan Maryam who was raised by different parents until she found herself in love with Abbas. She abandons her last foster parents Ferooz and Vijay  and marries  Abbas. Abbas after working as a sailor , fitter and finally an engineer whereas Maryam works as a cleaner in a hospital. The couple move from Birmingham to Norwich to Exeter. One day Abbas collapses and diagnosed with diabetes.  He who used to be solitary in mind and independent becomes dependent on Maryam. The latter has keen yearning for reconciliation with her foster parents whom she left long ago. Their children Hanna and Jamal come back from where they are studying and recollect their relationship with their father. Hanna changes her name to Anna and tread an independent path whereas Jamal who is vague in mind    aspires to realise his creativity. Abbas plunges himself into deep silence and recollects his poor childhood, struggle in getting himself  educated, school life in Mfenesini Though his miserly father was reluctant to send him for higher education, his brother Kassim and sister Fawzia came to his rescue.

    The narration goes back and forth. Abbas reminiscences, Maryam’s car taking of her husband, Anna’s life with Nick and Jamal’s struggles to establish himself are narrated in jumbled sequence. The Childrens’ anticipation and frustration to know their father’s history are mentioned. Hanna who came to be called Anna moved out of her father’s orbit of  affections. She expresses wonder when her mother informs that her father was listening to audio books of  poems. Abbas slowly plunges himself into his own reveries, Maryam expects her children to take care of each other and reconcile with her father. While Jamal was passionate in his causes, Anna was different. To Jamal, “moving is a moment of ruin and failure, a defeat that is no longer avoidable , a desperate flight, going from bad to worse, from home to homelessness, from citizen to refugee , from living a tolerable  or contented life to  vile horror.” (73)

Jamal while observing his neighbour, white-haired and dark-skinned painting his shed ruminates over the phenomenon  of  migration . “He knew that it was a clutter of ambition and fear and desperation and incomprehension that brought people so far and enabled them to put up with so much. And they could no more resist the coming than they could the tide or the electric storm.” (87) he thought that he could be South Asia or South Arabian,  Yemini. Millions are like that who belong and not belong in places they live but find happiness in small achievements  

Anna’s boy friend nick got a post at university and after  commuting  from Wandsworth to  Brighton he suggested moving to university . She  gave up her job and followed Nick. Anna had a recurring dream in new house in which she aw a house  partly derelict and she saw someone whom she could not identify. In the dream, she climbed a narrow stairs and force open a door and explained to some one invisible how to repair. When she recounts her dream to Nick, he could not make any sense of it and inquired if she was feeling guilty regarding her dad. She resented her father’s restrictions on her dress and overconcern about her boy friends about whom she maintained silence. But her relation with her mother was  more intimate. When Nick invited her home, she preferred to visit  her parents first and then went from Norwich to Chichester where Nick’s s parents lived.

 the novelist shows how alienation grows in family reactions of migrants who suffer from insecurity, loneliness, cultural change between their native country to where they migrated. Anna found it stressful to maintain intimacy with her parents as she wanted to find her own path of adventure and meaning. The generational gap too contributed its mite to the feeling of separation among the family.

   “ They were adrift, out of their depth, lonely together. They had done this deliberately , she thought, cut themselves off , living timorous lives, expecting slights and disregard.”.

This feeling of guilt and been traitorous is common to all where the children growing wings flyaway from their parents leaving the latter in their empty nest .  this was inevitable but it would not alleviate guilt feeling in the children. The parents too have to reconcile to the new condition as they cannot force the children to stay back in view of the latter’s  future.  

Anna visits nick’s family  Chichester and finds that they feel discomfort regarding her. Nick’s father Ralph is  an engaging conversationalist .  His mother Jill was a  professional who ran aa hospital and Anna thinks that she could intimidate her mother Maryam.  Ralph argues that correcting historical injustice could lead to new injustices in Zimbabwe. Ralph says some people cannot tolerate whereas others see injustice as natural order of things. He inquires her if she read Orwell. She who studied literature  gets impressed by Ralph’s write reading  but still feels  some sort of discomfort in her brief  stay with Nick’s family . “He made these comparisons without insistence, wit out enthusiasm, as if they were calm observations of civil truths. She wondered that ralph did not seem to notice the abrasive underside of his comparisons , which was a smug suspicion of everyone else’s  unsteadiness.”  (106) 

Gurnah brings out    the delicate likes and dislikes in family relationships. Maryam at first gives up he job and tends to take care  of Abbas. The chores needed to be learnt and done with as little disgust as possible. After a while , she wants to join  and offer her services at a refugee centre.  The novel unravels the difficult relation between the  natives and  the refugees and the psychological problems faced by the refugees in coming to terms with their past , the differences in upbringing of children at school left to the choice of the parents, the silences which accumulate, struggle for survival and the strains imposed by them due to the need for building bridges.

When Uncle Digby  asks her about her origins , she relies that she’s British. He wants to know what she had been before she became British. Anna says her father came form East Africa and   she didn’t know  the specific country from which she where her father came from. Uncle Digby says , “  We see families falling apart because children do not want to know about the world  their parents came from.  To keep communities together, host and stranger need to know each other , but we cannot know each other if we don’t know ourselves. We who care for the welfare of immigrants work as hard as we know how to get  that message across , to encourage people to know. Those words I am British   feel like a cold tragic blast to me.” (119) Later anna remembers how she has spoken slightingly about her father to Nick to assert her ‘British identity’ and recollects her father’s sense of  strangeness despite many years of living in a host country.

Jamal was initially reluctant to go to the mosque abut attend at the behest of his friend  Monzoor. The latter is  surprised by Jamal’s stance to now more before believing and praying. After 9/11 incidents, he realises sense of insecurity felt and he also remembers the state of mind of people of Palestine, Chechnya , the Congo and how people endured their situation. Gurnah also shows  through the eyes of Jamal  the petering out of the movements began in 1968, riots in 1999 and anti-war  demonstrations against Iraq war which was planned and waged war destroying large number of   people and many countries  ignoring mass protests. Some called it utopian and terror as real and Hanna and Jamal wondered at the   irony of  horror continued while their father  “was in his own deep fog and these new horrors hardly penetrated through his confusing pain.”(126)

Abbas slowly recalls his college days, interest in the girl on the opposite terrace, scandal , forced marriage at the behest of his sister Fawzia , his sense of dishonour by the family of the girl Sharifa, suspicion of trap by his in-laws and his desertion of wife and child.  When Maryam comes to know the truth from his confession, she feels aghast  knowing that her husband was a bigamist and maintained silence  for so long   and  she invites Anna to visit home once .  On the other hand , Anna leads a happy  life but begins to nurture doubts about Nick’s fidelity and Jamal is attracted and accosted by Lena who spurns his possessive boy friend Ronnie. What we find in the novel are how relationships get soured by  silences, guilt, infidelities and  suspicion of  fidelity of partners.

When a neighbour of his falls on the pavement while  coming back shopping   Jamal and Lena go to help him. Jamal disowns him when the  ambulance woman signs if he could come along and later repents that  what would have happened if his father suffered the same fate on the road  and not even remembering his name.

Both Anna and Jamal visit their home and listen to their Maryam about her early life how she was reared by Ferooz and Vijay. Initial kindness, entrance of cousin Dinesh , discrimination in treatment towards her by Ferooz and Vijay. She also tells how she was molested by Dinesh. While Anna could not bear to listen and wanted to go , Jamal was more understanding and sympathetic. This also shows how alienation grows in a migrant’s family and generational gap . For the fort generation, the burden of the past is hard to shrug off whereas the second generation of migrants struggle to assimilate themselves in new setting.

Anna’s uneasiness and inconvenience are brought out by her passing and negative opinion of two black women migrants at station and her recurring dream of rotting  house and heavy suit case symbolising burden of the past. She remains suspicious towards Nick despite lovemaking  after her return and fantasizes about her achievements. Her struggles to forge her own individuality away from over protective father Abbas and her boy friend  Nick are to be noted.  Anna also senses dislike shown by Ralph and Jill towards her and Ralph’s reference to her father’s bigamy annoyed her.  She   thought that whatever kindness shown “was offered in shame to disguise their distaste.” (228)

Gurnah shows the defensive stance of migrants, how they are  forced to forget, deny or distort their past, history and try to assume hide their restlessness. One example is Harun’s attempt to hide his wife’s photo and display  photos of earlier tenants in his house.  Harun was saved by Jamal and Lena earlier and this made them welcome visitors in Harun’s house. Harun  came from Uganda in 1960’s to  study journalism, made friends with a lecture Allan and later fell in love with Allan’s wife  Pat who educated him out of his timorous  scruples . But Harun didn’t go to his  family in Uganda who didn’t take kindly to his marrying of  Pat. 

At the end the relationship between Anna and nick ends when she finds that he has been cheating her after reading Julia’ s text on his mobile. Nick says back that her family has been gripped by” hopeless  melodrama acting like immigrants” and she failed to understand his parents Ralph and jill. Anna recalls  his  desire for her even before his exit and his colonial extinct to take what he wanted. She readies for her new life.

In the last part called rites we come to know Abbas’s wandering life through his taped  voice listened to by his daughter Anna. Abbas waned to keep secrets of his early life as it was done traditionally   from his family. He recounts how he went to Singapore, Indian cities and Durban, South Africa. He felt pangs of guilt for abandoning his  wife and child back in Zanzibar  on suspicion. He did menial work on the ship and as a scavenger and roamed on his own. He befriended one Ibrahim and was about to fall in love with his sister but left the place after being warned by Ismail. He didn’t want to talk about his fears , simmering hatred, ill treatment of women as merchandise,  tyrannical ways with children in his native land and embracing silence as a way of coping with unforgettable guilt and also Claire, the sister of Pascal whom he befriended in  Mauritius and felt sad to leave the place and at last his destined meeting with Maryam.  Anna recognised it “as a kind of unforgiving honesty , which she did not usually expect to hear in someone’s voice , let alone in her father’s (262)  After her father’s death and listening to his taped voice , Anna could see in her mind’s eye her father’s loneliness, his feeling of bus ride to college and her own similar experiences and him as a college student. This was the last gift from Abbas, the ability to sympathise and empathize cutting across generational gap, fears of migrants’ identity crisis and tryst with their past. At last Maryam  becomes active in her life through acting in and plays  along with her children Hanna and Jamal  visits her foster parents. She comes to know that she was born to a Polish mother and a British soldier a darkie with light complexion. First they surmise that Maryam could be from Jewish father but her name could have been Miryam if it were so. The missing vowel is critical as it denotes changes of nationality and in the novel we also find how  the novelist refers to Hanna  as Anna depending on her location , at home or at outside the home.   

 Jamal writes Anna about his impending visit to Zanzibar, the native place of Abbas. Anna in her reply refers to her dilemma , “ I feel myself suspended between a real place , in which I live , and another imagined place, which is also real but in a disturbing way.” (278) Jamal in his reply mentions her mother’s recovery of zest for life and a story awaiting to be written by him.

The novelist uses  the techniques of third person  narration, memory, confession, depiction of dreams  and letters to tell this very sensitive, pathetic , secretive and significant life of immigrants who struggle to sustain in their new country and amidst conflicting cultures. The tale is narrated in five parts  titled ‘ One Day ‘, ‘Moving’, ‘Flight ‘, ‘The Return’ and ‘Rites’.  Abdulrazak Gurnah succeeds in weaving a story that would create a deep sympathy for the migrants and their anguish to come to terms with the past and the present   in the era of globalization which brings different, hybrid  cultures together to workout a new way of living. The characters such as Abbas, Maryam , (H)anna, Jamal, Harun, Ferooz , Nick linger in memory for a long time .