Friday, 12 May 2023

Appreciation of Two stories Three Encounters and The Inn by Turgenev

 

Turgenev is a famous writer of Russia. His novels Sons and daughters , On the eve are very powerful in  firing the imagination of the young  readers under the spell  of  classical Russian novel.

The first novel has infused the young to rebel against patriarchal family and this quality is quite pervasive in those who read humanistic novels of Russia. A society steeped in feudalism has risen from sleep and began questioning the status quo. Russian novels have roused the sleeping conscience of the readers and put them on a path of struggle.  Although the struggles petered out in the course of time, the impact has not vanished. The modern world rapidly running towards the valley of death needs to be given a dose of this great literature to protect it from final extinction which comes through planned wars  and unexpected catastrophes.

The present review is concerned with Turgenev’ stories which touch a sensitive chord in the hearts of the readers. There are interesting stories such as Three Encounters, The inn, Faust , Asya, First Love, A steppe land King Lear, Clara Milich or After Death .

In all these stories , one comes across love in its pure form in confrontation with the world that contaminates it. The external world simply drives away the chariot of life wither astray or  towards death.

The first story is titled, Three Encounters. In this story, the narrator goes to a village called Glinnoye . There he listens to the  beautiful song by a girl and becomes curious to know about her but she eludes him. The narrator approaches the watchman of the estate on the hilltop  where this girl is supposed to live but gets little information  from the watchman called Lukyanich. He persists and finds out that two sisters live in the mansion on the hilltop. He is surprised to listen to the same song he heard  earlier , that is two years back In Sorrento , Italy.  Having failed  to learn much from the old man, he enquires in the village and informs himself that  the state was owned by a Major’s widow called Ann Fyodorovna Shlykova  and  her spinster  sister Pelageya  Fyodorovna  Badayeva. He had a  fleeting glimpse of the lady and later visits their eerie house in their absence and later comes to know that they had gone to Moscow and Lukyanich hanged himself to death. Later after three years , he happens to meet both the sisters in Moscow and listen to the song of Pelagea. Then a third time he finds the unknown singer in a masked ball and recognises the beautiful stranger and she admits that she has gone to the eatate house of her friend Anna Mikhailovskoye where the narrator saw her and her love. She also says that her love has deserted her . But the narrator comes across the her former love with another lady. The beautiful stranger dashes to the exit and the narrator finds out about the strange foreigner but does not wan to now about his beautiful stranger. Turgenev ends the story,  As I have said , tis woman appeared to me as aviso in, and as a vision she passed and vanished forever.”  In the story , we find Turgenev’s lyricism.

 “For a sound. It was for the sound of living voice this sensitive silence waited, but all was quiet. The nightingales had stopped singing…and the sudden buzz of  a passing beetle, the smacking sounds made by the  small fish in the  breeding pond behind the limes at the end of the garden, the sleepy whistle of a startled bird , a faraway cry -so faraway that one could not tell whether it came from a man, a beast or a bird, a brief sound of stamping on the road -all those faint sounds, all those rustlings only enhanced the silence…My heart ached strangely and nostalgically with an anticipation or perhaps with

A remembrance of happiness; I dare not stir , I stood motionless before the motionless garden drenched with moonlight and dew, and myself not knowing why stared fixedly at the two windows glowing faintly red in soft shadows, when suddenly a  piano chord was struck in the house , a reverberating sound..”  (24  )

Not only nature but  Turgenev surpasses  in the description of beauty of  woman seen by the narrator.

“How lovely she was! How charming  was her slender silhouette against the emerald- green of the foliage! Soft shadows and muted shafts of sunlight  slid over her-  over her long grey dress , her slender neck, her pale -pink face , her glossy black hair flowing luxuriantly from under her small hat. But how render in words the look of consummate, passionate bliss on her face , passionate to the point of speechlessness! Her head seemed to droop from the burden of this insupportable bliss; her eyes were half-closed , but I could see them sparkling with moist, golden sparks; they were not looking at any thing, these happy eyes under the fine-drawn eyebrows. A vague, childish smile -a smile of profound joy hovered over her lips. It seemed that such an excess of happiness tired her and was breaking her a little, just as a flower bursting into full bloom sometime breaks its own stem.“ (34)

This kind of description fills the hearts of the readers with delight and recreate a sense of mystery, beauty , feelings of  haplessness when beauty is found false beneath appearance. They are left with a  sense of understanding as well as lingering dissatisfaction like Turgenev’s characters in the story.   

 

     Another story is “The inn” in which we find three important characters called Akim Semyonich , Naum Ivanich and Dunyasha.  Akim , the hardworking carrier turned inn keeper, Naum , the young man who is smart, gull and cunning in attracting Dunyasha the house keeper whom Akim married at late age. Naum cheats Dunyasha and Akim of their inn by purchasing it secretly with the money given by Dunyasha ensnared by him   from Liza , the landlady on whose land Akim ran his inn. In the end Akim attempts to burn the inn of Naum, gets caught red handed and  escapes punishment due to intervention by Akim’s friend  Yefrem and becomes a spiritual wanderer whereas Dunyasha reverts to her old position of domestic maid Of Liza.   

Turgenev powers of description of the inn and characters reveal their nature and their  consequent actions . Turgenev’s description of Naum who is known as the lucky man who was seen as born lucky and a busy business man who traded in orses, rented land, kept vegetable fields, bought up orchards and in engaged in  sundry deals,  is described as follows :

He was of the medium- height, fat , broad-shouldered and slightly stooped; his head was big and round, his hair was wavy and already grey , although he did not look more than forty; his face was full and fresh, the forehead was low but white and unlined, his eyes were small and blue, and he had a peculiar way of looking ; sullenly , yet brazenly , a rather rare combination. He always kept his head lowered and turned it with reluctance , probably because his neck was so very short; he had a brisk walk instead of swinging his arms he spread them out, with the fists clenched. While he smiled , he did not laugh but often smiled as if to himself -his big lips parted unpleasantly to show a row of close-set, gleaming teeth. His speech was brusque and there was glum note in his voice.  (54)

In contrast Akim  who was originally a serf of Lizaveta Prokhorovna Kuntze, the land lady and widow of aa staff-officer, did carrier trade, vexed with nomadic life, had  aa wife who died early , bought some land and built an inn there . he was experienced, pleasing personality and was amiable with customers in contrast with Naum was reticent, calculated .  Akim  who was the original owner of the inn was described  by the writer Turgenev as follows :

He was tall, rather thin, and had a handsome carriage even in the middle age ; his face was long and well-proportioned, he had a tall,  open forehead , straight nose  and a fine, small-lipped mouth . his full brown eyes shone with a friendly gentleness, his thin soft hair curled in the ringlets at the back of his neck, although there was little left of it  on the top of his head. The sound of his voice was very pleasant but weak; in his young days he was quite a singer, but long exposure to  the cold in the winter did harm to his chest and throat. His speaking manner was mellifluent, and when he laughed , little wrinkles radiated from the corners of his eyes -it is paly kind people who have such sweet-looking wrinkles. His movements were mostly slow , and there was in them the confidence and dignified civility of a man who has seen much in his life.         

 This contrast in their physical appearance and behaviour with others gives a clue to the discerning reader.  Here  the dictum, ‘character is destiny’ applies well and gives an inkling of what is going to happen.   

 The landlady Lizaveta was also a profiteering and highly calculated  woman , maintains a number of servants, indulges in and encourages gossip. This makes her sell her land to Naum in a dubious manner, employ her head maid and unscrupulous  Kirillovna to finalise her deal with Naum for two thousand roubles,  to meet the distressed Akim when he comes to meet Liza over injustice done to him but only grace we find in her is to get Dunyasha or  Avdotya Arefyevna married to Akim and in the end giving her shelter in her miserable state after being abandoned by Akim .

Dunyasha, the  young and second wife of Akim Semyonich , the original owner of inn, suffers from laziness and frustration,   gets attracted to Naum Ivanich, the cunning  young man  ,  falls in love with him , gives even money of her husband to her love who buys land and inn secretly and expels   Akim and her . Her misery is self-made,  the advantage of her city upbringing vanishes and her husband refuses to punish her and  deserts her forever to become a religious wanderer. Naum who has turned into a prosperous businessman also sells the inn and leaves for  another gubernia after fifteen years and on the same day the inn perishes in fire.

In the very description of the Inn  run first by Akim and later by Naum , we find a difference.

 Akim’s inn was rather  more traditional, it was warm but not too clean; there might be chaff in his oats or a spot of damp; the food was only just eatable, and sometimes the dishes  he served should have never come out of the oven at all,  and it wasn’t he was niggardly with the victuals, it was simply the negligence of the woman who did the cooking.    (55)

Whereas Naum managed it differently. It was opulent in appearance,  provided with good water, spacious yard,  a plentiful store of good oats,  a  warm main room , two clean enough rooms , painted wooden sofas and chairs to match, potted geraniums but dusty window panes.

 A good meal could be had there by the grace of the fat, apple-cheeked cook who made rich, tasty food and was not niggardly with second helpings; the nearest pub was only a half verst away; the snuff kept in store by the inn-keeper was extremely strong , for all that it was mixed with cinders, and  tickled the nose very nicely.  (53)

Another interesting character in the story is Yefrem, the parish reader  who comforts Akim in distress, gives shelter in his home, boasts vainly  of control of his wife and rescues Akim from certain punishment when the latter was caught in attempting  to burn down the inn out of desperation.  

 In the entire story runs  a sense of tragedy, irony between hope and reality,  the contrast  in human nature in kindness  and in  its  perversion due to  laziness  and profiteering. The writer Turgenev does not make nay comment on characters but describes them and leaves the readers to experience pity, horror and a sense of reconciliation in human life and leaves a deep impression on the mind of the readers.                                           

                    

 Primary Source:

Borovsky, David, trans. Ivan Turgenev : Stories and poems in Prose. Progress Publishers: Moscow, 

     1982 . 

 

 

 

                

Monday, 8 May 2023

Essence and Relevance of Nani Palkhivala’s views on Indian Constitution

 

  

(from  “ Selected writings “ (1999)  edited by LM Singhvi , MR Pai and S.Ramakrishnan)         

Nani Palkhivala  in his article “Has the constitution Failed?” makes the point that people have to be keepers of the constitution. He quoting S.Sinha, provisional Chairman of Constituent Assembly says that republics fail when the profligate are preferred to the wise in public councils . Politics has become unworthy of even the name of rat race and democracy reached the nadir as the average politician has become devoid of intellect, knowledge, character. Before the problem worsens to crisis and disaster , the honest and the young must take part in politics. He also writes “ Equality before the law is the  very foundation of a republic. Equal opportunity is the very foundation of social justice. But equality is achieved only in the graveyard.” He wants the aristocracy of talent,  knowledge and character  must enter public life. He wants the government by the experts to avoid authoritarianism. His punchline comes at the end, “The peacock must not be replaced a the national bird by the ostrich.” (  77)

In  another article , ‘Desirable Changes in Constitutional Law’, he thinks that the governance should not be completely  left to the mercy of the professional politicians. He proposes some desirable  changes in our basic laws without changing the constitution.

 1) transparency and auditing the accounts of the political parties. This is possible by adding another section to RP Act, 1951.

  2)partially proportionate representation system in which  political parties gaining more than 5 percent of votes cast in a region may be given representation by amending the Representation of People Act . proportional representation in the Lok Sabha  is permissible under article 81 of the constitution. 

3) Minimum qualification for those wanting to become representatives of people  as law giver needs education to acquire   intellectual equipment, objectivity, independence of mind, character.

4) to reduce toppling game

Some other change required are which would need  constitutional amendment    without changing the basic structure .

1)      Taking some ministers from outside the parliament by amending article 75 that requires a minister at the centre should be , or become  with in six months ,a member of parliament. 

2)      Resignation by a minister to his seat in parliament to focus on governance as in France  

3)      Change in Article 75 to enable  each state send two representatives elected by universities and professional bodies from each State and one from union territory

Nani Palkhivala thinks that every generation has to  defend and fight for freedom  for its survival and passing on as a legacy to  the posterity.  

Regarding electoral reforms, he says what are needed are cleansing the electoral system and expresses unhappiness regarding adult franchise in the very beginning in 1950 rather than as culmination of years of experience and training. This has led to the predominance of caste or religion or clan or creed. This opinion is debatable as Indian voters sowed maturity time and again in the past and changing governments in 1977, 1980 and in 2014. They are capable of repeating the same in future also if required .

His article on ‘States Are Not Vassals Of The Union’ is very relevant these days . Here, he says the  representatives  of  the States to parliament  are ‘the real authors of injustice’ because “The centre is nothing but the states in their federal garb.”  He mentions four basic considerations incentre-state relations.

1.   The centre must be reminded that it needs to show” constitutional morality , particularly a sense of justice and fairness to states.” (92)

2.       A strong union can only be a Union of  strong states 

3.       National interest has paramountcy in case of conflict without affecting self-respect or resources of the state.

4.       The grievances of the state should be addressed by conventions rather than amendment.

5.       Centre needs to act in the spirit of constitution.

in case of industries , the centre needs to have control over industries of national interest and leaving the rest to states ‘ jurisdiction .  Nani , in reference to President’s rule  Opines that it is better to retain article 356 devising a mechanism to prevent its  misuse. He also mentions that except in case of civil disorder, president rule should not be imposed without first dissolution and general elections.

He also observes that “we have systematically devalued various constitutional institutions including the office of the governor’ and the latter’s position has been “reduced to that of  the resident agent in a native State in the days of the British raj.” (96-97) He points out that “ A governor is expected by the constitution to reserve only such  bills for the president’s assent as are patently unconstitutional or palpably against the national interest.” (98)

He also opines that the Planning Commission is  ‘’a body without any constitutional or legislative sanction.” (98)and suggests   Financial Commission  should decide grants under Article 282 .

 Now the planning commission has been dissolved on 13 August ,2014 replaced by NITI Aayog.

Nani Palkhivala observes that the Seventh FC had recommended that 40 percent of  taxes should be transferred to the States and  opines that “the States must be given a legal right  to a larger share in the tax revenues collected by  the Centre, instead of having to rely up[o the discretionary largesse of the Union under Art.282.’’ (100)

After nearly four decades, we find that according to 15th Financial Commission  

“The share of states in the central taxes for the 2021-26 period is recommended to be 41%, same as that for 2020-21.  This is less than the 42% share recommended by the 14th Finance Commission for 2015-20 period.  The adjustment of 1% is to provide for the newly formed union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh from the resources of the centre.” (https://prsindia.org/policy/report-summaries/report-15th-finance-commission-2021-26. Accessed on 9th May, 2023 )

At the end , Nani  points out says that the centre’s attitude to treat states as ‘vassals’ and maintains that the “lasting  solution lies not in the statute- book but in the conscience of men in power.” (102), that is the members of the parliament and dynamic and informed public opinion. His memorable lines  are :

“In a constitution what is left unsaid is as important as what is said.”  

"The survival of our democracy and the unity and integrity of the nation depend upon the realization that constitutional morality is no less essential than constitutional legality. Dharma (Righteousness ; sense of public duty) live sin the hears of public men ; when it dies there , no constitution , no law, no amendment can save it.” (102)  

Sunday, 7 May 2023

Alluri Sitaramaraju

 

                                         

You have  pledged  to destroy  tyranny dreadful over folks

You are the ocean of light bright     

Out of surging waves of   revolutionary fervor of India!

Yours is history  immortal  for Telugus!

 

On seeing   your  brave figure of warrior spirit

Elated  was  Telugu nation  in India!

Blasted   were  rivals’ ears  by your conch of victory

Blessed was the forest by touch of your feet!     

 

Scion of royals ! You  looted the government   alien 

Out to exploit the innocents  with its hands  demoniac

Spread  the red salutes your   movement heroic

before the feet of   Andhra prowess!

 

Followed by  Gamu  Doras as body guards

 And the army of Bhils with their bows

You took up the  Bow of Dharma

 Jumped to smash the  shackles of Mother!          

 

Let the whites  might have labeled   you a bandit leader!

What did you  rob?

The anger untenable!

Tyranny unlimited!    

 

Unable to see her lord of life

Your love gave up her life

Uniting with her

‘ Ramaraju’ turned ‘Sitaramaraju’!

 

Pride, perseverance, patriotism

Bravery matchless were yours

Sacrificing your life in the fire of freedom fight

You  ennobled Telugus’ hearts!!  

 

Police took you away with  prayers

Treated  you like the  Lord supreme

Piled  their weapons before your feet lotus

Kudos to your influence enormous!!

 

Perturbed were the military battalions for your “Mirch Mail”

Shaken the brute power at your upsurge

Shines forever  your history like gems bright

 At  the top of the Crown of Bharata Bharati!! 

         (Original : from  Udayasri , II by   Karunasri   )                                                    

 Rabindranath Tagore 

"The same stream of life that runs through my veins night and day runs through the world and dances in rhythmic measures. It is the same life that shoots in joy through the dust of the earth in numberless blades of grass and breaks into tumultuous waves of leaves and flowers." 
This very well sums up the philosophy of life that world needs today for encouraging bio-diversity and sustainable development. 

Language as Jet : An appreciation of Blood , Toil, Tears and Sweat : The Great speeches

                                          (During and after the WW II)                       

Churchill’s speeches during the war roused the Britishers to fight against Hitler’s regime. In his famous speech titled  Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat ( 13 May,1940) , Churchill recalled to head the government says

 You ask, what is our aim ? I can answer in one word: Victory -victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be ; for without victory, there is no survival. Let that be realized; no survival for the British Empire; no survival for the urge and impulse of the ages, that mankind will move forward towards its goal. (149 )              

This shows that war is between an empire fast declining and another one which is hoping to rise. This is a war between imperialists. At the same time Churchill rouses his nation to wage war against tyranny. He uses ‘wage war’ repeatedly to rouse the nation in crisis.

 You ask, what is our policy? I will say: It is to wage war by sea, land and air, with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us; to wage war against a monstrous tyranny , never surpassed in the dark, lamentable catalogue of human crime.” (149)

His words are stirring in his speech ‘Wars Are Not Won by Evacuations’ ( 4 June, 1940) .;

We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on  the seas and the oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence in the air, we shall defend our island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches , we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender…(165)

He exhorts his countrymen to stand up to Hitler as follows :

Upon this battle depends the survival of Christian civilization. Upon it depends our own British life, and the long continuity of our institutions and our Empire… But if we fail then the whole world , including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.” (178)  

In the same speech he uses phrases such as  ‘disillusioned eye’ and we come across  ‘prodigious slaughter’ , ‘Olympian fortitude’ ( In “A Long and Hard War’, 1941)

 In his speech ‘The Few’ (1940) we find the undimmed hope :

The British nation and the British Empire finding themselves alone, stood undismayed against disaster. No one flinched or wavered; nay, some who formerly thought of peace, now think only of war. Our people are united and resolved , as they have never been before. Death and ruin have become small things compared with the shame of defeat or failure in duty. (184-185)      

The War was won by the UK against Hitler  but the Empire which was expected to last forever    began crumbling in 1947 with India gaining independence.

In post war period Churchill spoke  against socialism and ‘abject worship of State’ and says in his speech ‘Some form of Gestapo’ (1945):

“Socialism is, in its essence, an attack not only upon British enterprise, but upon the  right of the ordinary man or woman to breathe freely without having a harsh, clumsy , tyrannical hand clapped across their mouths and nostrils.’’ (273)

 In his speech ‘The Iron Curtain’, 1946 he still  spoke glowingly about Russia.

       “I have strong admiration and regard for the valiant Russian peoples and for my wartime comrade Marshall Stalin.”

“While wishing for abiding friendship, the rightful place for Russia among the leading nations of the world, he  immediately expresses his apprehension From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic , an iron curtain has descended across the  continent” (303) During the  Cold war period this antagonism continued in the backdrop of  threat of  nuclear Armageddon.    

Even way back in 1919, Churchill used the language of solid imperialist against Russian Revolution. “Of all tyrannies in history the Bolshevist tyranny is the worst, the most destructive , and the most degrading. It is sheer humbug to pretend that it is not far worse than German militarism. The miseries of Russian people under the bolshevists far surpass anything they suffered under the Tsar.” (88)

He was bitter since Russia withdrew from imperialist war causing the deaths of many s imperialist soldiers , supported  White army generals who lost at the end ,  worried over the prospects of revolution in Germany,  and describes the Russian Bolshevist  causing  anarchic destruction and calling for resisting ‘the advances of Bolshevist tyranny’ (92)

He, after the second World War, praised  in his speech ‘Never Despair’ delivered in  1955 ‘the glorious defence of their native soil by the Russian armies and people have inflicted wounds upon the Nazy  tyranny ’ (343) and said he was not against Russian people. Despite Russian  mighty role  in defeating Germany at an enormous cost in the second World war, Churchill’s opposition to the Soviet regime continued afterwards. But it was the Soviet Union which stood by India in its struggle for freedom.

     

 

 

 

 

 

                            

Saturday, 6 May 2023

Language as Spitfire : A critical appreciation of Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat : The Great speeches

                                        

                                                  Selective : part 1 ( Before the WW II )

   It is difficult to like Churchill, the politician but it is more difficult to dismiss Churchill’s  speeches  and his war time contribution to defeat fascism. Churchill harnessed English language for   victory. He played his role in the sustenance and  the  celebration of the Empire.

Churchill  (1874-1965) prepared hard to become a successful  political leader and writer. He joined conservative party in 1900 and left it in 1904 to join Liberals. He rejoined conservative party in 1925.  In his career he became MP, Minister of munitions, minister of State for War and Air and Prime minister twice  during 1940-1945 and 1951-55. He published many works , The Story of Malakand Field Force (1898), The River War and Savrola (1899), The World Crisis (1923-31), My Early Life (1930), Thoughts and Adventures ( 1932), Marlborough: His Life and Times  1933-38) , Great Contemporaries (1937), Step by Step (1939), The Second World War (1948-54), A History of The English -Speaking Peoples (1956-58). He won the Nobel prize for Literature in 1953.

In his speech  “I Have done My Best” in 1925 he writes regarding the role of national government as follows:

“Action-action, not hesitation; action, not words; action, not agitation. The nation waits its orders. “ The French Revolution could not defend the soil of France without compulsion. The American commonwealth could not maintain the integrity of its State without compulsion, but modern Britain has found millions of citizens who all of their own free will have eagerly or soberly resolved to fight and die for the principles at stake and to fight and die in the hardest , the cruellest, and the least rewarded of all the wars that men have fought.” (68)

He refers to  the deadly enemy Germany which stops  at nothing  for victory, he writes, To fail is to be enslaved , or, at the very best, to be destroyed.” (69) He paints  vividly through his rhetorical flourish the nature of enemy. Churchill ‘s remarkable skill in unearthing motivation of enemy is laudable.

.. we are confronted with a foe  who would without the slightest scruple extirpate us,  man, woman, and child , by any method open to him if he had the opportunity. We are fighting a foe who  would not hesitate one moment to obliterate every single soul in this great country this afternoon if it could be done by pressing a button.   

Here the premonition of weapon of mass destruction. In the first World War    

“As many as 74,187 Indian soldiers died during the war and a comparable number were wounded. Their stories, and their heroism, have long been omitted from popular histories of the war, or relegated to the footnotes.”   ( https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-33317368)

We Indians do not take kindly to the disparaging remark on Gandhi by Churchill. In his speech made in 1931, Churchill  criticizes socialist administration and remarks   “It is alarming and nauseating to see Mr. Gandhi , a seditious Middle Temple lawyer, now posing as a fakir of a well known in the East, striding half-naked up the steps of the viceregal palace . while he is still organizing and conducting a defiant campaign of  civil disobedience , to parley on equal terms with the representative of the King-Emperor.“ (103)

 This negative description of Gandhi  dented  the image of Churchill in Indian mind and later his opposition to grant independence to India .  

Churchill was concerned about stronger German Air force and in his speech ‘The Locust Years’(1936)  which means lost criticized govt. as follows in powerful language which expresses ambiguous attitude of the government.

 “So they go on in strange paradox, decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity , all-powerful to be impotent. ‘ (121)

When Czechoslovakia was sacrificed to Germany he gave a speech criticizing the appeasement policy  or five  lost years for Britain and France  in  “ A Total and Unmitigated Defeat’(1938) as follows:

 We have been reduced from a position where the word ‘war’  was considered one which could be used only by persons qualifying for a lunatic asylum. We have been reduced from a position of safety and power -power to do good, power to be generous to a beaten foe , power to make terms with Germany, power to give her proper  redress for her grievances, power to stop her arming if we chose, power to take any step in strength or mercy or justice which we thought right -reduced in five years from a position safe and unchallenged to where we stand now.  (136)

By repeating the same phrase ‘ we have been reduced’ he emphasises what has been lost and this certainly is an impassioned and  impressive speech though at the time it was considered alarmist.

While referring to the Prime minister’s desire for cordiality between Britain and Germany he supports relations between people of both the countries  but not with German government. His speech reveals a clarity of mind unclouded by  the hostility between two nations.  

 You must have  diplomatic and correct relations , but there can never be friendship between the British democracy and the Nazi power, that power which spurns Christian ethics, which cheers its onward course by a barbarous paganism, which vaunts the spirit of aggression and conquest, which derives strength  and perverted pleasure from persecution,  and uses, as we have seen , with pitiless brutality the threat of murderous force . That power cannot ever be the  trusted friend of the British democracy. (141)

Primary  source :
 Ed. Cannadine, David.  Winston S. Churchill    Blood,, Toil, Tears and  Sweat :the Great Speeches . 

       London: Penguin Books, 2007.      

Friday, 5 May 2023

Sprouting of Truth and Reconciliation : A Close Reading of Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o 's A Grain of Wheat

 

Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o wrote the novel, A Grain of Wheat in 1967 and revised it in 1987. The novel shows the conditions during the Mau Mau movement against the British Colonialism. It shows how different characters of the novel react differently in the condition then prevailed.   Mugo  embraces silence being guilt ridden, Gokonyo torturing him self with his suspicion and  alienation from his wife Mumbi , Mumbi’ s helplessness in her submission to Karanza, collaborator with the British and a rival of Kihika , the martyr of the movement,  and the attempts by Kihika’s  comrades to find out the person responsible for Kihika’s death.

 Mugo  who has come back from detention camp starts alone on the outskirts of village Githima  . His silence is taken as seriousness by others but he is afraid of others such as the mother of Githogo, the deaf and dumb man killed by the soldiers and his aunt Waitherero. While Mugo immerses himself in farming , Gikonyo who is  also  a returnee  from a  detention camp  turns into  a successful businessman.   

Another old man Warui refers to the martyrs such as Waiykai and Harry who died for the community. Wambui was an old woman who had great tales about her boldness in helping the  movement . Koina and the General R.  were on the mission to find out the betrayer of Kihika.

Gokonyo who also returned from, detention camp expresses his doubt regarding his child born in his absence to Mugo who also listens to the story of Mumbi later on. So, he is comparable to a pastor who is a privy to the confessions of the troubled people.

In the same novel we also find the sub plot of John Thompson, the librarian of research station. Thompson who  returns from Madagascar campaigns gets interested in literature and history and is on writing the work Prospero in Africa.    His wife Margery frustrated is seduced by  Dr Van Dyke who meets a sudden death. Margery is filled by guilt but her uneasy relation with her husband continues as they are about to leave Kenya on the eve of ‘Uhuru’ or independence.

Karnaza is another character shown as the lackey of the British but who tries to appear friendly with  his own community. He  is like one who wants to hunt along with hounds and running with hares.

The novelist creates pathos,  irony, wry humour and the impact of guilt on individuals. The deaf and dumb Githogo’s death  while running in his bid to rescue his mother and being seen as terrorist by the soldiers. The cruel death of Waiyaki expected to  raise horror and Gikonyo’s anguish over his wife Mumbi’s infidelity in her utter helplessness and starvation. He depicts the colonial officer Thompson’s obsession  in his work of civilizing the savage that leads to his wife Mergery’s seduction by Dyke and  her alienation  from her husband. His humour brings  a silent smile on the lips of the reader when he comes to the last line.   

  “The eating- house was called Your Friend Unto  Death, in short , Friend. The stony walls were covered with grease, a fertile ground for flies. They buzzed around the customers, jumped on top of the cups and plates and at times even made love on food brought on the table.(39).”

Ngugi also portrays the  estranged relationship among the Whites. He sees how Dr Lynd’s aggressive dog tries to attack Karanja, the silence of the black people, the fears of Dr .Lynd regarding the blacks and who narrates how her trusted  domestic servant along with two others gagged her and  killed her dog brutally. Thompson who also  worked as a district officer remembers the killing of eleven detainees at Rira when they went on hunger strike and  being in charge he was shifted to Githima.

Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o  shows corruption prevalent in colonial s well as  employees after independence. MP, police who accept money from Gikonyo, Karanja who wants to have best of both the colonial era and aftermath are representative of corruption.

 Mugo’s  physical appearance and  inner reality are  polar opposites. The people have respect for his solitary behaviour, time and suffering  in camp. Ngugi describes him as follows:

“He was tall with large dark eyes; the lines of his face were straight, clearly marked, almost carved in stone -one of those people who induce hope and trust on the evidence of their looks.”( 63) but this is completely in variance with what goes on in the mind of Mugo when he is invited to speak at uhuru celebrations. He becomes suspicious of party men for choosing him in stead of other such as Gikonyo or Warui or any other forest fighters , praises himself  cunningness in telling convincing lies but could  not refuse himself  from speaking. In the meeting other detainees spoke of love for country which kept them alive whereas Mugo spoke of his love of home but his abrupt ending makes people see him only positively.

Gikonyo was an adroit carpenter who loves his work. He also falls in love with Mumbi, the sister of kihika . Ngugi describes the happiness Gikonyo felt while making panga for Mumbi’s mother. Here Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o  writes as follows ;

   “He felt free .Everything , Thabai , the whole world was under the control of his hand. Suddenly the wave of power broke into ecstasy, an exultation. Peace settled in his heart.He felt a holy calm; he was in love with  all the earth.” (80).

Earlier a woman brings a piece of  wood to Gikonyo. Here the writer describes the carpenter’s passion in his work.

The woman stands there admiring the movement of his muscles. After a while, he lifts the piece of wood , its far end resting on the table. He shuts the left eye and peers at the wood with his half-open right eye. The he closes his right eye and repeats the performance with the other eye. This finished, he knocks at it swiftly, rhythmically. With the knuckle of the right front finger as if he is exorcizing spirits from the wood. Next, he takes the hamme; srike, listen, srike, listen. Then he sniffs the wood carefully ( that is professionally), and gives it back to the woman. He resumes the other job.(72)   

 

 One of the Kenyans called  Jackson converted  to Christianity and tried to influence others. The  converts or the revivalists were suspected by the movement people and Jackson and earlier teacher Muniu. Kihika was a rebel from his school days , questioning his teacher Muniu for false interpretation of the Bible regarding circumcision, refuses from punishment by teacher and runs away to freedom. He inspires  Mumbi and others through telling them how Gandhi defied the British rule and courted prison. Mumbi, the beautiful girl loves and chooses  Gikonyo in preference to Karanza . Whiee the trio were running to see the train, Karanza outruns them leaving free both Gikonyo and Mumbi to experience joy of union. The novelist describes it in lyrical prose. Karanza who feels outwitted turns jealous and  apprehensive about intimacy between Gikonyo and Mumbi and struggle hard to control himself.

    The novelist portrays the humanist side of Karanza despite his jealousy, breaking of oath, siding with the colonials and the  seduction of Mumbi who gives birth to his child. You find similar desertions – the desertion of Wambuku who refuses to  go into forest along with Kihika , Gikonyo’s  confession to the authorities to exchange  detention camp life for imaginary happy life with his wife Mumbi and mother Wangari which proves illusory when he come to know of Mumbi’s child from Karanza , his  impotent anger against Karanza , Mugo who lends his ear to listen to  the anguish of Gikonyo and Mumbi all the while hiding his guilt for his  part in the betrayal and death of Kihika ,his consternation when praised by drunkard  Githua who lost his leg to a colonial  bullet and who addresses him as the chief  in the bar    Gatu, who keeps his courage and humour intact in Yala camp  and Kihika emerge as undaunted  heroes and martyrs. Njeri shows contempt when she comes to know of Wambuki’s  weakness in her love towards Kihika , Gikonyo’s rage against the child of Mumbi and Karanza , and the Gikonyo’s desperate  look at  Rung’ei are portrayed rather poignantly. What we find here is a see-saw game between trust and distrust, illusion and reality,  purity of the soul and  circumstantial corruption , idealism and  cynicism.  Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o  shows  the conflicting forces in all their humanity ,the intricate conditions and good and evil in people on either side.

The writer’s description of nature is stunning. While describing the memory of day during emergency,

 The crops- young maize plants, potatoes, beans, peas-opened out and spread their leaves to the sun. Mugo used a small jembe to turn the soil over in the bare and weedy patches between the plants , his fingers earthing up the crops. As he disturbed the plant stems , the dew drops on the leaves would break and melt away. The air was fresh and clear and sharp. The fields around, all covered with green  things-long, wide leaves hiding the dark earth-appeared beautiful to look at. The sun became increasingly hotter; the moisture on leaves evaporated; leaves dropped, so that at noon the greatness had waned , slightly ashy, and the fields appeared tired. Mugo lay back under the shade of a Mwariki and experienced that excessive contentment which one feels during a noon ret from toil(121-122)           

           

While visiting Gikonyo’s home , he remembers his stay in camp , hoe he remained tight-lipped during interrogation, hunger strike by the  detainees and beating and deaths of eleven prisoners.  Mugo does not Gikonyo at home, mumbi invites him for tea and relates how Wambuku , Kihika’s woman has gone berserk after she comes to know of the death of kihika. Mumbi also comes to know about Gikonyo’s revealing of their relation including how she bore  the child of Karanza..

The novel shows how the colonial administration seeks revenge for an attack on Mahee Police post, demolishes old homes of Thabai village and erects a camp, restrains movement of people leading to starvation of women and children and even molestation of  women by soldiers who cause the death of Wambuku. Mumbi elates her story after Gikonyo was taken away, the starvation of her family of five including her parents faced, deaths of villagers in the  trench labouring and Karanja who has joined home guards and became Chief later on  approaching her , her calling him Judas, his protestations of innocence and vouchsafing of the supremacy of the Whites,  the intimacy between her mother-in-law and herself  talking of release of Gikonyo and  giving herself to Karanja in submissive gratitude.

The irony lies in  her confession to Mugo who has been a betrayer of Kihika  to be exposed during freedom celebrations. The novelist describes the dilemma  of Mugo  after listening to Mumbi’s story in a moving manner.

 She paused. The light still played in her dark voluptuous eyes. She was young. She was beautiful. A big lump blocked Mugo’s throat. Something heaved forth; he trembled; he was at the bottom of  the pool, but up there, above the pool ran the earth; life, struggle ,even amidst pain and blood and poverty, seemed beautiful; only for a moment; how dared he believe in such a vision , an illusion? (146)

Kihika’s friends General R. , Koina and others are in search of the betrayer. They suspect Karanja as  the responsible person for Kihika’s death.Kranja himself is afraid of the exit of the British colonials.

John Thompson who served the empire faithfully in all its brutality and ‘civilizing ‘ mission  realises that their days of reign  are over in Kenya, but  tells his wife Margery while returning from  party,” Africa cannot, cannot do without Europe.”(  161)

While Mugo is haunted by guilt and searching eyes of people, every one line Warui, Githua and others think of him as hero. His refusal to agree to  talk during freedom festival is seen as modesty. His confession to Mumbi  who when asked by others went to convince him to talk at the festival. He recounts the horrors of the camp life and expresses his guilty mind.

 Imagine all your life you can not sleep-so many fingers touching your flesh-eyes always watching you-in dark places-in corners-in streets -in the fields-sleeping, waking, o rest-ah! Those eyes- cannot you for a minute , leave a man alone- I mean -let a man eat, drink, work-all of you-Kihika, Gikonyo -the old woman, that general -who sent you here tonight / who ? Aah! Those eyes again -we shall see who is stronger-now- (180)

He  prevents  her from leaving and uses physical force making her see terror in his wyes and submitting herself to him and sobbing later.  

Mugo remembers Kihika’s meeting with him after Killing Robson, his words on importance of freedom , the human fears of death and ask Mugo to meet him again. the novelist portrays the psychological ambiguity of Mugo, Karanja and even Gikonyo who  separates from his wife Mumbi over her bearing the child of karanja. Gikonyo’s mother chides him for his insensitivity. Karnaja  who has joined home guards and killed many black freedom fighters feels lost after the exit of the British, feels slighted over Mumbi’s concern for the Gikonyo wounded in the race with karanja, gets reprieved by Mugo’s confession of his guilt and dies by suicide after falling under train. The same Mugo who defied the colonial whipping of a pregnant woman in the trench, feels Kihika as a nuisance in his  comfortable life , betrays him  and earns the  scorn of the whites, spends a term in the camp  and  returns home  to suffer from guilt. His open confession during Uhuru celebrations shocks people and leads to his death by Kihika’s friends.

But his courage in confession is applauded by Karanja ,  and even Gikonyo who remembers his  own confession regarding oath taken and he grasps that he is not much different from others who bent if not broken.The novel ends on a note of reconciliation between   Gikonyo in hospital and Mumbi who still retains her freedom of choice. Gikonyo thinks of a wedding gift , a stool carved from Muiri wood . “ I’ll change the woman’s figure. I shall carve a woman big -big with child.”(243)  

In the novel Mumbi emerges as a fascinating character. She is a sister of Kihika, loves Gikonyo, suffers starvation during mergency and tales care of her parents,  mother-in-law and child,  tries to save Karanja by sending him a note,  understands Mugo, and stands  free  psychologically in her life.   

In the entire novel   Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o unfolds the drama of struggle in all its complexity, ambiguity and brutality of the colonial officers, passion for freedom of people like Kihika, and general R, Koina, cowardice , betrayal, opportunism by some blacks who join the colonial system,  sufferings of  fathers, mothers  , wives and the detainees and inevitable compromises  of the women like Mumbi, Wambuku during the struggle period  and the folks’  worship of the heroes or whom they  assumed  as heroes in freedom struggle, the silence of Wambui over the fate of Mugo punished by the movement. Jomo Kenyatta’s invisible presence, and  the continuation of colonial police system even after independence. The novelist presents the complex  truth in beautiful and poignant prose delineating the situation and  characterisation of the people caught in the transition to  freedom.