The book The Rule of law By Tom Bingham has
three parts . The first part deals with topics such as the importance of the rule of Law and
history of it. In the part two, issues
such as the accessibility, equality before law , human rights, and its niche in the international Legal
Order are taken up for study and part three deals with contemporary issue such
as Terrorism and the Rule of Law and the
latter’s relation with the sovereignty of parliament.
Initially Bingham refers to
Professor Dicey’s coinage of the term and mentions three points, no one can be
punished except under established law, no one
is above law and a special attribute of the English institutions. It has
vagueness, extended from the U.K. to America, rest of Europe, Australia and New
Zealand . Tom Bingham sees the core principle as that “all persons and
authorities within the State, whether public or private, should be bound by and
entitled to the benefit of laws publicly made , taking effect (general) in
future and publicly administered in the court.” (8) He also writes that the
hallmarks of the regime sans the rule of law are , “the midnight knock on the
door, the sudden disappearance, the show
trial, the subjection of prisoners to genetic experiment, the confession
extracted by torture, the gulag and the concentration camp, the gas chamber,
the practice of genocide or ethnic cleansing, the waging of aggressive
war.” (9) many of these characterized the fascist regimes of Germany and Italy
and Russian totalitarianism.
Tom mentions that European commission has consistently treated the democratization,
the rue of law, the respect for human rights and good governance as inseparably
interlinked.” (67) He thinks that a
savagely repressing or persecuting state in case of some sections cannot be regarded
as observing the rule of law despite having
“the detailed laws duly enacted and scrupulously observed.” (67) While the Soviet Union reduced the
principle of the rule of law to statutory laws for the dictatorship of
proletariat, Nazism saw law as the will of the nation and realized in Fuehrer.
He sees the rights recognised by European Convention on Human Rights and the
Human Rights Act 1998 are fundamental and protection of them does not elevate
individual rights at the expense of community.
The right to life
The article 2 provides every one’s right to life shall be protected by law and
restrictions conditions in which law may be lawfully taken . it is the most
basic right. English law has protected this right by criminalising murder,
manslaughter, infanticide, causing death by dangerous driving, by having no
truck with euthanasia and by imposing civil liability on those who cause death
negligently but not criminally.
Suicide has not been a crime
since 1961 but abetment to it is a crime. This is in tune with European court
of Human Rights which has put obligation on member states not to take life
without justification. They are also obliged to establish a framework of laws, precautions ,procedures
and means of enforcement which will protect life to the maximum practical extent .
Article 2 is invoked when a death
has occurred . it cannot give redress to
the deceased but to the family and close relatives of the deceased who
are rightly regarded as victims. They have right to know what has happened to the victim and to
prevent repetition of such incidents in future.
Article 3: The prohibition of
torture
This article provides that “ No
one shall be subjected to torture or to
inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
The common law ( followed by
statute) opposes torture several centuries ago and the Bill of Rights, 1689
barred the infliction of cruel and unusual punishments.
Article 5: Right to liberty
and security : This says no one shall be deprived of his liberty except
under cases and the procedure established by law. A person arrested has to be
told in a language he can understand the reason and charge against him. He
shall be brought before the court promptly and in case of unreasonable delay in trial, he must be released on bail. A
detainee can challenge the lawfulness of his detention be decided quickly and his
release ordered in his detention is unlawful. In case of violation of article,
he is entitled to financial compensation.
Article 9: Freedom of thought
, conscience and religion
Article 10: Freedom of
expression
This right is there under some prohibitions of
statements such as libel, slander ,
dishonest criticism of others’ goods, contempt of court, breach of copyright , obscene,
seditious, inciting to mutiny, or crime or disclosure of the official secrets.
Article 11 : Freedom of
assembly and association
Conclusion : An awareness of these
rights will lead to a vibrant democracy in the world. Knowledge is a bliss and ignorance is a curse in the present
context where common people are facing many hurdles in realizing their basic rights to call themselves as
citizens of the civilized countries.
No comments:
Post a Comment