https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vE7ixh3ZNQNZjwKAuJucjlGjK24pGM83/view?usp=drive_link
Thursday, 21 November 2024
Wednesday, 20 November 2024
a book of poems translated from English into Telegu titled ''Yedalothullo''
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dVTvG97zPDYzfWA7UJB8-w_Q1WAjXBid/view?usp=drive_linkTuesday, 7 May 2024
Mikhail Sholokhov's novel "Virgin Soil Upturned" : A Review
Sholokhov’s novel Virgin Soil Upturned
shows the phase of collectivisation of agriculture in 1930s in the then Soviet Union. Davidov is sent to achieve
total collectivisation to a village Gremyachy Log. . he along with Nagulnov and
others persuades the farmers to go into collectivisation . The farmers who are initially reluctant agree
to it . But the process is not smooth as
the former white guards and sympathisers of Kulaks try to put spokes in the
process to fail the experiment. Yakov Lukich plays a dual role in acting as
expert in agricultural affairs and covertly aiding general Polovtsev planning to start a rebellion against the
soviet power. They even kill Khoprov and his wife thinking that the former
would reveal their treacherous past. Razmyotnov. Maidannikov ,Shchukar,
Lubishkin, Demid , the silent support
collectivisation and kulak families such as are sent away. Nagulnov adopts an aggressive
line and collectives even livestock but later he has to admit his mistake and
return poultry, in the story the man-woman relations also form a parallel plot.
Nagulnov’ wife Lushka take sup with Timofei, a son of Kulak and hardly cares
about what others think. Davidov acts as a facilitator and zealot in solving
problems arising out of reluctance of farmers and impetuosity of Nagulnov in hastening collectivisation. He does not
approve of il treatment of women . General Polovtsev’s attempts to rouse
Cossacks fail when they come to know from Stalin’s letter that collectivisation
can go as per the cooperation of the farmers.
The village gets slowly transformed and faces many hiccups
in moving towards Collectivization. The class war has not subsided but taken a
different turn and bureaucrats are hard pressed to meet the targets. The
Cossacks known for their martial valour
and rebellious spirit turn slowly towards collective agriculture.
The problems in drawing people
towards collectivization are portrayed in a vivid manner. The poor farmers were
enthusiastic, the middle level farmers rather reluctant and kulaks were hostile
either openly or covertly . the peasants feel it hard to part with their land
and live stock. Many resorted to killing of their live stock posing problems to
the organizers. They had to be refrained from
lightering their livestock. Nagulnov’s
hard approach has not succeeded whereas Vanyusha’s amicable approach convinced even the most
reluctant, once Stalin’s letter
criticizing left deviation came to be known, the farmers come and demand their
land and livestock back. Nagulnov has come under criticism .
Sholokhov’s woman characters are
assertive and rebellious. Razmyotnov’s wife Marina cares no man and takes away
her land and starts ploughing. Lubishkin and others who try to intervene are intimidated
by her strength and will power . Nagulnov’s wife Lushka whom he divorces cares
a jot for social and sexual mores that
constrain her and mocks Davidov for his reluctance to postpone taking of her
hand till after sowing and her former husband
Nagulnov for neglecting her in the name of world revolution.
Reading all this after nearly a
century shows a village in a different
era and how it struggles to come to terms with changing fortunes of Soviet
power. The iron hand of State keeps people to play safe or murmuring and they
find it difficult to change themselves to
a anew situation.
Party leadership calls Nagulnov
and charges him with left deviation and expels him from the party. His plea
regarding his past service is no regarded and he says that he would approach
regional committee. Meanwhile in Gremyachy Log Village things become hot and
the villagers, particularly women refuse to give awa seed grain to the
collective farm of Yarskoi. The fury of women leads to attack on Razmyotnov,
Davidov and others and they attempt to open the barn to take back their rain.
Grandad Shchukar ‘s relating of his childhood experiences and his getting
outwitted by a gypsy in purchasing a mare provide humorous relief to this
serious novel of class struggle that
takes new forms in its intermingling with personal animosities.
The novel shows the trials and
tribulations faced in collectivization . Makar Nagulnov and Davidov slowly convince the people, join new members in the party and try to capture saboteurs
like Yakov Lukich and officers of old
regime Polovtsev and Latyevsky.
whom he shelters. Davidov agrees to marry Varya, joins her in an
agricultural college for training and comes back to the village Gremyachy Log. In the attempt to capture the enemies of
revolution , Davidov and Nagulnov are killed. The culprits are later caught and
duly punished. Varya comes back to take car of her family and grandad Shchukar
and other party men such as Razmyontov
and Maidannikov are filled with sorrow.
Razmyontov sees beyond the horizon
‘’the sky was ablaze with scarlet flame and , wakening nodding Nature to fresh life, the last storm of that
year broke in a majestic fury , as if at the height of Summer.”
Thursday, 11 April 2024
A Review of Sashi Tharoor’s Nehru : The Invention of India
Sashi Tharoor’s work, Nehru :
The Invention of India gives an
amiable as well as an objective portrait of Nehru. Nehru’s evolution from an
indifferent youth to passionate patriot to
national leader to become the first prime minister of India . He has discovered
India through his writings , experiences
and international outlook which made him an outstanding leader. Motilal Nehru
and other members of his family joined Nehru in national movement and the father
recognised early the man of destiny in him. Nehru gave up an aristocratic life
style in favour of life of hardships which moulded his character in to a fiery nationalist
. To him Gandhi was a father figure .Though his scepticism made him doubt Gandhi’s
political judgements, he came round in the end. He was a democrat to the core
and wrote an anonymous article against himself in which he opposed personality
cult. His secularism, Socialist ideas leading to introduction of planning in independent India and his balancing
through non-aligned movement in the era of cold war gave him a lot of recognition
on the world stage. But Tharoor criticizes his emphasis on the public sector which was finally given up
in favour of privatization in 1990’s by the government of Late P.V. Narsimha Rao-led Congress government. Tharoor
‘s beautiful and captivating style offers
an intimate and warm profile of the champion democracy who refused to
shake hands with Fascism and corresponded with chief ministers of the States in
the interests of federalism. Though Chinese turnaround and a war lost caused him a lot of anguish to
him who supported China before and after its independence for its liberation
and rightful place in the UN. His relations with his colleagues such as Patel, Bose,
Rajendra Prasad, Ambedkar are cordial despite differences in their approach. Nehru treaded a middle ground between the Right and the Left and did
his best to retain the unity of various groups in the party. He could not but
accept Partition forced by the British but he never compromised regarding
secularism and remained a beacon of hope to lay foundation for
industrialization of India. He experienced an intense loneliness as an
individual but dedicated his entire life for the glory of India and upholding
the principle of unity in diversity. His Kashmir policy attracted a lot of criticism but he never believed in
theocratic approach to the problem and His failures if any were due to excessive trust in others . He evinced a passionate desire for international peace in the era of cold war in which nuclear threat loomed
large.
Sunday, 10 March 2024
Rereading Barrister Parvateesam After Four Decades
Barrister Parvateesam is a
novel that delights as well as instructs. It uses humour to expose cultural
differences between the east and the West. Written a century ago , it still is
highly readable although it language seems somewhat remote now but relevant at
the time of writing .
In the first part we find Parvateesam in his childhood ,
school life, adolescence in which he
joins nationalist movement to the cost of education resulting in failure
in studies and later decision to go abroad to become a barrister. It is the most
humorous part depicting pranks in school days, competition for place in merit
order and initially he comes out on flying colours. His father chides him for
failure and asks him to look after
agriculture. Then Parvateesam leaves his village without informing his parents. His train journey
shows many humorous incidents from taking ticket, tying his bundle to chain
used to stop the train, use of washroom . When he gets down in Madras he
haggles with cart drivers, changes his
hairstyle, buys sundry things which are
needed in England , goes to a shopping mall and falls while trying to walk on
tiles instead of on carpet. On board steamer to Colombo to Marseilles, he faces
troubles due to his vegetarianism, sea sickness and uncertainity about his
future.
In the second part written after forty
six years at the behest of Narla Venkateswara Rao and Puranam Subramanya
Sarma , the reputed editors of Andhra Jyoti , the novelist shows subtle humour arising out of cutural
clash. Parvateesam reached London and was fortunate to have a friend like Menen and later Raju to allay
is fears in the beginning stage. Menen
familiarizes him with life in England taking him to otels. Picture houses and
explaining intricacies of social behaviour. Raju helps Parvateesam a lot. When Parvateesam
joins Barrister at law In Edinburgh university, Raju helps him find a residence, familiarizes the
apt behaviour , takes him to picture houses and familiarizes him with games like golf.
Parvateesam soon learns things quickly , becomes a good player of golf and
earns name whne he recites Telugu poems in the presence of Anant Kumara
swamy . Duggirala Gopala Krishnaiah, later a veteran freedom movement leader
appreciates him a lot . Parvateesam’s
experiences in his rented house with his land lady and her two daughters as a
good soul. He puts up with their pranks and takes them to see plays . his love with a Scottish girl shows him as a young man given
to emotions but prudent enough not to cause nay suffering to his family. He
realises his limitations and bids her farewell with much anguish. While on
return journey, he and other passengers pass through a perilous journey due to
the world war going on at the time. In
the part we find Parvateesam growing into a man of good manners. Knowledge,
responsibility and unblemished moral
sense. Humour comes out in misunderstanding new cultural norms . Two examples
are that Paravateesam when invited to a party feels shy to ask for washroom in
host’s house and urinates at the street cornet and even discloses it
thoughtlessly. He also takes to task one new comer from India who goes to an
evening party in the morning itself and
wants to stay there even in the night without bothering about inconvenience to
his hosts.
In part three, we find Parvateesam’s
return to his native place, the innocent questions by the curious villagers
about his life and education there . It is like the coming back of Ulysses.
Here the novelist describes the foreign returnee’s reflections, loneliness ,
agreeing for arranged marriage thanks to
the trick by his friend and well wisher Raju . The protagonist enjoys reunion
with his parents , their love and affection and initial reluctance to tie the
knot and final succumbing to tradition. The story is told in a style of subtle
humour. Paravteesam goes to Madras and meets eminent lawyers such as Narayana
Murty and Tanguturi Prakasam( the real character
in Andhra history) and becomes a practising
lawyer in high court . He also gets his wife Saraswati educated .He
gains name in a short span but both of
them he slowly gets attracted to
nationalist movement, meet stalwart leaders like Duggirala
Gopalakrishnaiah at the cost of his practice and economic
status. He relates many humorous anecdotes in lawyering. He gets very active in nationalist movement , finds the increasing suppression of the
people in movement by the British , gets
disillusioned by lack of ethics in lawyering
practice and undergoes even jail
term in the cause of freedom movement. At last he goes back to his native
place, refuses his father-in-law’s advice to carry on his practice and decides
to listen to his father who wants to take care of their agricultural lands. We
find a sort of parallel between this part and Kodavatiganti Kutumbarao’s
‘Chaduvu’ . The difference is that Sundaram’s saga has completely happened in India
where as Parvateesam is a foreign returnee. But both of them have got
influenced by traditional mores and also national movement . Their education has not
turned them into careerists but as people who responded to the call of the
nation.
The novel has a few things which
are more politically incorrect these days. His reference to nonvegetarian
food as ‘malakoodu’ and depicting the reaction of the other customers at his entry in a
hotel ‘as if they saw an untouchable amidst brahmin meal’ in the first
part. But this only reflects the bias of the novelist prevailing at the time and even now casteism has not been eradicated
completely from our social system. The
travails of Parvateesam are reflection of conflicts faced by the middle
class and upper caste Indian youth caught in the cultural conflict between the
East and the West a century ago.